IMPLEMENTASI CKAN PADA PORTAL OPEN DATA DPMPTSP SUMATERA SELATAN DALAM MENDUKUNG KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK

https://doi.org/10.23960/buanakata.v3i3.2196
Published: Jul 25, 2026

Abstract:

Keterbukaan informasi publik membutuhkan portal data yang tidak hanya tersedia secara daring, tetapi juga mampu menyajikan data yang mudah ditemukan, dipahami, diunduh, dan digunakan kembali. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis implementasi CKAN pada Portal Open Data Dinas Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (DPMPTSP) Provinsi Sumatera Selatan serta merumuskan prioritas optimalisasinya. Penelitian menggunakan desain studi kasus deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data diperoleh melalui observasi langsung terhadap antarmuka portal, pemeriksaan halaman organisasi, dataset, metadata, sumber daya, fitur pencarian, dan akses unduhan, serta telaah dokumen dan regulasi. Instrumen evaluasi terdiri atas delapan indikator yang disusun berdasarkan struktur CKAN dan literatur kualitas portal data terbuka. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa empat indikator telah terpenuhi, yaitu ketersediaan dataset, identitas organisasi penyedia, sumber daya data, dan akses unduhan. Empat indikator lainnya terpenuhi sebagian, meliputi kelengkapan metadata, efektivitas pencarian, penggunaan format yang mudah diolah, dan konsistensi pembaruan data. Temuan tersebut menegaskan bahwa CKAN telah menyediakan fondasi teknis bagi keterbukaan informasi, tetapi nilai guna portal masih dipengaruhi oleh tata kelola data di tingkat organisasi. Optimalisasi perlu diprioritaskan melalui standardisasi metadata, penetapan jadwal pemutakhiran, penyediaan format terbuka, konsistensi tag, dan penunjukan penanggung jawab dataset. Penelitian ini menghasilkan kerangka evaluasi praktis yang dapat digunakan untuk pemantauan berkala portal data perangkat daerah.

Public information disclosure requires a data portal that is not merely available online but also enables users to find, understand, download, and reuse data. This study analyzes CKAN implementation on the Open Data Portal of the South Sumatra Provincial Investment and One-Stop Integrated Services Office (DPMPTSP) and formulates optimization priorities. A descriptive qualitative case-study design was employed. Data were collected through direct observation of the portal interface, examination of organization pages, datasets, metadata, resources, search functions, and download access, as well as document and regulatory review. The evaluation instrument consisted of eight indicators derived from CKAN's structure and open-data portal quality literature. The findings show that four indicators were fully met: dataset availability, provider organization identity, data resources, and download access. Four other indicators were partially met: metadata completeness, search effectiveness, machine-processable formats, and update consistency. These results indicate that CKAN provides an adequate technical foundation for information disclosure, while the portal's practical value remains dependent on organizational data governance. Optimization should prioritize metadata standardization, scheduled updates, open and reusable formats, consistent tagging, and clear dataset stewardship. The study provides a practical evaluation framework that can support periodic monitoring of regional government data portals.

Keywords:
1. CKAN
2. government portal
3. metadata
4. open data
5. public information disclosure
Authors:
1 . M. Naufal Miftahul Hakim
Universitas Bina Darma
2 . Mohamad Farozi
Universitas Bina Darma
View PDF
How to Cite
Hakim, M. N. M., & Farozi, M. (2026). IMPLEMENTASI CKAN PADA PORTAL OPEN DATA DPMPTSP SUMATERA SELATAN DALAM MENDUKUNG KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK. Jurnal Buana Kata: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(3), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.23960/buanakata.v3i3.2196
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX
Issue & Section
Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Buana Kata: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Articles
References

    CKAN Association. (n.d.). CKAN 2.11 documentation. Diakses 23 Juni 2026 dari https://docs.ckan.org/en/2.11/

    Habibie, K., Suhardi, S., & Muhamad, W. (2023). Implementation of data governance on the open government data management platform to improve data quality. IJAIT (International Journal of Applied Information Technology), 7(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.25124/ijait.v7i02.5979

    Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740

    Komisi Informasi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Komisi Informasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 tentang Standar Layanan Informasi Publik.

    Lnenicka, M., Nikiforova, A., Luterek, M., Milic, P., Rudmark, D., Neumaier, S., Santoro, C., Casiano Flores, C., Janssen, M., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2024). Identifying patterns and recommendations of and for sustainable open data initiatives: A benchmarking-driven analysis of open government data initiatives among European countries. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), Article 101898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101898

    Máchová, R., & Lněnička, M. (2017). Evaluating the quality of open data portals on the national level. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 12(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762017000100003

    Molodtsov, F., & Nikiforova, A. (2024). An integrated usability framework for evaluating open government data portals: Comparative analysis of EU and GCC countries. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 899–908). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657159

    Neumaier, S., Umbrich, J., & Polleres, A. (2016). Automated quality assessment of metadata across open data portals. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 8(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2964909

    OECD. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 2. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en

    Raca, V., Velinov, G., Dzalev, S., & Kon-Popovska, M. (2022). A framework for evaluation and improvement of open government data quality: Application to the Western Balkans national open data portals. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221104813

    Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik.

    Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia.

    Ruijer, E., Détienne, F., Baker, M., Groff, J., & Meijer, A. J. (2020). The politics of open government data: Understanding organizational responses to pressure for more transparency. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(3), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019888065

    Ubaldi, B. (2013). Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 22. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en

    Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., Becker, M., & Müller, W. M. (2022). Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Electronic Markets, 32, 2381–2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00582-8.

  1. CKAN Association. (n.d.). CKAN 2.11 documentation. Diakses 23 Juni 2026 dari https://docs.ckan.org/en/2.11/
  2. Habibie, K., Suhardi, S., & Muhamad, W. (2023). Implementation of data governance on the open government data management platform to improve data quality. IJAIT (International Journal of Applied Information Technology), 7(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.25124/ijait.v7i02.5979
  3. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
  4. Komisi Informasi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Komisi Informasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 tentang Standar Layanan Informasi Publik.
  5. Lnenicka, M., Nikiforova, A., Luterek, M., Milic, P., Rudmark, D., Neumaier, S., Santoro, C., Casiano Flores, C., Janssen, M., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2024). Identifying patterns and recommendations of and for sustainable open data initiatives: A benchmarking-driven analysis of open government data initiatives among European countries. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), Article 101898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101898
  6. Máchová, R., & Lněnička, M. (2017). Evaluating the quality of open data portals on the national level. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 12(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762017000100003
  7. Molodtsov, F., & Nikiforova, A. (2024). An integrated usability framework for evaluating open government data portals: Comparative analysis of EU and GCC countries. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 899–908). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657159
  8. Neumaier, S., Umbrich, J., & Polleres, A. (2016). Automated quality assessment of metadata across open data portals. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 8(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2964909
  9. OECD. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 2. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en
  10. Raca, V., Velinov, G., Dzalev, S., & Kon-Popovska, M. (2022). A framework for evaluation and improvement of open government data quality: Application to the Western Balkans national open data portals. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221104813
  11. Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik.
  12. Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia.
  13. Ruijer, E., Détienne, F., Baker, M., Groff, J., & Meijer, A. J. (2020). The politics of open government data: Understanding organizational responses to pressure for more transparency. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(3), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019888065
  14. Ubaldi, B. (2013). Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 22. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en
  15. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., Becker, M., & Müller, W. M. (2022). Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Electronic Markets, 32, 2381–2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00582-8.