Transformation of Science Literacy in Elementary Schools: Guided Inquiry Learning Model-Based Teacher Training with PhET Simulation in Pringsewu Regency Elementary School

Diterbitkan: Jan 31, 2026

Abstrak:

The purpose of carrying out this community service activity is to provide understanding and train stakeholders in implementing technology-integrated learning in elementary schools in Pringsewu Regency. The specific target to be achieved is that participants can implement the PhET Simulations-based guided inquiry learning model in their respective classes so that they can improve students' science literacy. The methods used to achieve the goals and targets are (1) expository: presenting and conveying information about 21st century learning, learning models and media; (2) tutorials and mentoring: providing procedures for implementing the integrated guided inqury model learning of PhET Simulations; (3) assignments and discussions: designing group learning; (4) role playing: implementation of guided inquiry learning integrated with PhET Simulations through teaching practice; (5) carry out pretest and posttest; and (6) reflection and evaluation: discussion of challenges and solutions faced during teaching practice. The target of the activity was teachers and principals of elementary schools in Gadingrejo District, Pringsewu Regency. The expected result is that teachers are able to carry out guided inquiry learning integrated with PhET Simulations to improve students' science literacy. The results obtained from this service activity are an increase in teachers' understanding of 21st century learning, the importance of science literacy is reminded from an early age in elementary schools in Gadingrejo District, Pringsewu Regency. In addition, participants were able to implement the PhET Simulations integrated guided inquiry learning model well through classroom learning and reflect and evaluate the course of learning related to the challenges faced and the solution efforts.

Penulis:
1 . Ujang Efendi
Universitas Lampung
2 . Deviyanti Pangestu
Universitas Lampung
3 . Muhammad Nurwahidin
Universitas Lampung
4 . Pramudiyanti Pramudiyanti
Universitas Lampung
5 . Farida Julia Saputri
Universitas Lampung
6 . Wiranto Oktavian
Universitas Lampung
7 . Farhan Iqbal Pratama
Universitas Lampung
View PDF (ENGLISH)
Cara Mengutip
Efendi, U., Pangestu, D., Nurwahidin, M. ., Pramudiyanti, P., Saputri, F. J. ., Oktavian, W., & Pratama, F. I. (2026). Transformation of Science Literacy in Elementary Schools: Guided Inquiry Learning Model-Based Teacher Training with PhET Simulation in Pringsewu Regency Elementary School. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 57–71. Diambil dari https://jurnal.pbs.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpmip/article/view/1289
Unduh Sitasi
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX
Terbitan & Bagian
Vol 5 No 1 (2026): January 2026
Articles
Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Referensi

    Adawiyah, R.N., Nasir, M. and Azizah, N. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry PhET Interactive Simulation Terhadap Keterampilan Generik Sains. OPTIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(2), 275-285.

    Darrah, M., Humbert, R., Finstein, J., Simon, M., Hopkins, J. (2014). Are Virtual Labs as Effective as Hands-on Labs for Undergraduate Physics? A Comparative Study at Two Major Universities. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 23 (3). 803–814.

    Dewi, N. A. R., & Sunarti, T. 2018. Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains dengan Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Pada SMA untuk Materi Alat Optik. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 07(03), 381–384.

    Effendi, D. N., Irwandani, Anggraini, W., Jatmiko, A., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. 2021. Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Literacy Using VOS Viewer: Analysis of Science Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012096

    Elisa, Mardiyah, A., Ariaji, R., (2017). " Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika dan Aktivitas Mahasiswa Melalui Phet Simulation”. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran. FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan. p-ISSN: 2599-1914, e-ISSN: 2599-1132 1, (1), 15-20.

    Firdaus, C., & Sulandra, I. (2021). The students’ interest in a guided inquiry learning. , 2330, 040036. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043122.

    Firman, W., & Anhusadar, L. (2022). Peran guru dalam menstimulasi kemampuan kognitif anak usia dini. Kiddo: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 3(2), 28-37.

    Iddy, H., Fussy, D., Mkimbili, S., & Amani, J. (2024). Supporting the Development of Students’ Scientific Literacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35, 405 - 422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2287790.

    Istiqomah, C. Z., & Hariyono, E. 2019. Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 08(02), 682–685.

    Kelp, N. C., McCartney, M., & Sarvary, M. A. (2023). Developing Science Literacy in Students and Society: Theory, Research, and Practice. JMBE: Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00058-23.

    Kemdikbud. 2023. Peringkat Indonesia pada PISA 2022 Naik 5-6 Posisi Dibanding 2018. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2023/12/peringkat-indonesia-pada-pisa-2022-naik-56-posisi-dibanding-2018

    Khomaidah, S., & Koeswanti, H. D. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dan Guided Inquiry Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(2), 371–378.

    Laily, S., Rahmi, R., & Ikhwan, M. (2024). Differentiated Learning Strategies to Improve Science Literacy in Elementary Schools. Terampil: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar. https://doi.org/10.24042/terampil.v11i1.23571.

    Luthfiana, A., Habiddin, H., Wonorahardjo, S., Dasna, W., & Rahayu, S. (2024). Scientific Literacy in Science Instruction: Media and Teaching Approach Employed. Education and Human Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v8i3.5417.

    MM, R. Y., Irwandani, Asniati, M., Anwar, C., & Subandi. 2020. Development of Google Form Based on Scientific Literacy Principles for Junior High School Students in Heat Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012055

    PhET. (2025). About PhET. https://phet.colorado.edu/en/about. (Accessed on April 20, 2025 at 20.51 WIB).

    PISA. 2022. PISA 2022 Science Literacy Result.

    https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2022/science/international-comparisons/#stab1

    Prasetiyo, M. B., & Rosy, B. (2021). Model pembelajaran inkuiri sebagai strategi mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9(1), 109-120.

    Price, A. M., Perkins, K. K., Holmes, N. G., & Wieman, C. E. 2018. How and Why Do High School Teachers Use PhET Interactive Simulations? Physics Education Research Conference, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2018.pr.Price

    Putri, S.K. and Gumala, Y. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry terhadap Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Journal Basicedu, 7(5), 2993-3003. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i5.5963.

    Rizalia, S., Fahrizi, Z., & Sukmawati, S. (2024). The Significance of Science Literacy in Biology Learning. KULIDAWA: Journal of Biology Education, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.31332/kd.v5i1.8459.

    Rumimpumu, F.F.N., Londa, T.K., Polii, J., and Lolowang, J. (2024). Efektivitas Penggunaan Simulasi Phet Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Asas Kontinuitas di SMA Negeri 1 Likupang. SOSCIED, 7(1).

    Sakina, B., Ekawati, R., & Dasna, I. (2024). The Influence of Guided Inquiry Worksheets on Science Literacy and Learning Outcomes in Fourth-Grade Students. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v6i3.6376.

    Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. 2021. Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students ’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), 1–9.

    Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

    Saputra, H., & Sari, M. (2022). the effect of the guided inquiry learning model on science learning outcomes. Universe. https://doi.org/10.24036/universe.v3i2.215.

    Serevina, V., Yumna, A., & Islamiah, N. (2021). Pelatihan media PhET simulation untuk pembelajaran jarak jauh. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Sains dan Aplikasinya (JPMSA), 1(2), 14-23. https://10.21009/jpmsa.v1i2.22673.

    Siahaan, F. E., & Pane, E. P. (2021). Penerapan Pendekatan Saintifik Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Untuk Meningkatkan Soft Skills Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika, Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5877–5884.

    Sirait, S.H., Irwansyah, Sinulingga, K.N.B., and Putri, J.I. (2025). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Berbasis Model Inkuiri dengan Media PhET pada Hasil Belajar IPA dan Aktivitas Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 15(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v15i1.2359.

    Suarmika, P. E., Pratiwi, V., & Samsuri. 2024. Determinasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Media Interaktif PhET terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SD. JPDI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 9(54), 67–71.

    Sun, Y., & Chan, M. (2024). Pathways to early science literacy: Investigating the different role of language and reading skills in science literacy among early primary school children. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2335671.

    Trianto. 2007. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Surabaya: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

    Verawati, N., & Wahyudi, W. (2024). Raising the Issue of Local Wisdom in Science Learning and Its Impact on Increasing Students' Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i1.10881.

    Verdian, F., Jadid, M. A., & Rahmani, M.N. (2021). Studi Penggunaan Media Simulasi PhET dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 01(02), 39-44.

    Wahyuni, T., Firdaus, M., & Silfianah, I. (2024). The Correlation Between Digital Literacy And Scientific Literacy Abilities With Students’ Learning Outcomes On Chemistry Material In Everyday Life. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains. https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v15i2.20199.

    Wahyuni, R.I. and Rosdiana, L. (2023). Penerapan Model Guided Inquiry Learning dengan Media PhET Simulation untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 13(2), 487-492. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v13i2.1067.

    Wasis, Rahayu, Y. S., Sunarti, T., and Indana, S. (2020). HOTS & Literasi Sains: Konsep, Pembelajaran dan Penilaiannya. Surabaya: Kun Fayakun.

    Widiyanti, F., Indriyanti, D. R., & Ngabekti, S. 2015. The Effectiveness of The Application of Scientific Literacy-Based Natural Science Teaching Set Toward The Students’ Learning Activities and Outcomes on The Topic of The Interaction of Living Organism and Environment. JPPI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i1.3496

    Wijaya, S., & Handayani, S. L. (2021). Pengaruh Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (Pogil) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Di Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Basicedu, 5(4), 2521–2529.

  1. Adawiyah, R.N., Nasir, M. and Azizah, N. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry PhET Interactive Simulation Terhadap Keterampilan Generik Sains. OPTIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(2), 275-285.
  2. Darrah, M., Humbert, R., Finstein, J., Simon, M., Hopkins, J. (2014). Are Virtual Labs as Effective as Hands-on Labs for Undergraduate Physics? A Comparative Study at Two Major Universities. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 23 (3). 803–814.
  3. Dewi, N. A. R., & Sunarti, T. 2018. Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains dengan Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Pada SMA untuk Materi Alat Optik. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 07(03), 381–384.
  4. Effendi, D. N., Irwandani, Anggraini, W., Jatmiko, A., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. 2021. Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Literacy Using VOS Viewer: Analysis of Science Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012096
  5. Elisa, Mardiyah, A., Ariaji, R., (2017). " Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika dan Aktivitas Mahasiswa Melalui Phet Simulation”. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran. FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan. p-ISSN: 2599-1914, e-ISSN: 2599-1132 1, (1), 15-20.
  6. Firdaus, C., & Sulandra, I. (2021). The students’ interest in a guided inquiry learning. , 2330, 040036. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043122.
  7. Firman, W., & Anhusadar, L. (2022). Peran guru dalam menstimulasi kemampuan kognitif anak usia dini. Kiddo: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 3(2), 28-37.
  8. Iddy, H., Fussy, D., Mkimbili, S., & Amani, J. (2024). Supporting the Development of Students’ Scientific Literacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35, 405 - 422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2287790.
  9. Istiqomah, C. Z., & Hariyono, E. 2019. Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 08(02), 682–685.
  10. Kelp, N. C., McCartney, M., & Sarvary, M. A. (2023). Developing Science Literacy in Students and Society: Theory, Research, and Practice. JMBE: Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00058-23.
  11. Kemdikbud. 2023. Peringkat Indonesia pada PISA 2022 Naik 5-6 Posisi Dibanding 2018. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2023/12/peringkat-indonesia-pada-pisa-2022-naik-56-posisi-dibanding-2018
  12. Khomaidah, S., & Koeswanti, H. D. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dan Guided Inquiry Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(2), 371–378.
  13. Laily, S., Rahmi, R., & Ikhwan, M. (2024). Differentiated Learning Strategies to Improve Science Literacy in Elementary Schools. Terampil: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar. https://doi.org/10.24042/terampil.v11i1.23571.
  14. Luthfiana, A., Habiddin, H., Wonorahardjo, S., Dasna, W., & Rahayu, S. (2024). Scientific Literacy in Science Instruction: Media and Teaching Approach Employed. Education and Human Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v8i3.5417.
  15. MM, R. Y., Irwandani, Asniati, M., Anwar, C., & Subandi. 2020. Development of Google Form Based on Scientific Literacy Principles for Junior High School Students in Heat Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012055
  16. PhET. (2025). About PhET. https://phet.colorado.edu/en/about. (Accessed on April 20, 2025 at 20.51 WIB).
  17. PISA. 2022. PISA 2022 Science Literacy Result.
  18. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2022/science/international-comparisons/#stab1
  19. Prasetiyo, M. B., & Rosy, B. (2021). Model pembelajaran inkuiri sebagai strategi mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9(1), 109-120.
  20. Price, A. M., Perkins, K. K., Holmes, N. G., & Wieman, C. E. 2018. How and Why Do High School Teachers Use PhET Interactive Simulations? Physics Education Research Conference, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2018.pr.Price
  21. Putri, S.K. and Gumala, Y. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry terhadap Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Journal Basicedu, 7(5), 2993-3003. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i5.5963.
  22. Rizalia, S., Fahrizi, Z., & Sukmawati, S. (2024). The Significance of Science Literacy in Biology Learning. KULIDAWA: Journal of Biology Education, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.31332/kd.v5i1.8459.
  23. Rumimpumu, F.F.N., Londa, T.K., Polii, J., and Lolowang, J. (2024). Efektivitas Penggunaan Simulasi Phet Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Asas Kontinuitas di SMA Negeri 1 Likupang. SOSCIED, 7(1).
  24. Sakina, B., Ekawati, R., & Dasna, I. (2024). The Influence of Guided Inquiry Worksheets on Science Literacy and Learning Outcomes in Fourth-Grade Students. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v6i3.6376.
  25. Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. 2021. Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students ’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), 1–9.
  26. Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  27. Saputra, H., & Sari, M. (2022). the effect of the guided inquiry learning model on science learning outcomes. Universe. https://doi.org/10.24036/universe.v3i2.215.
  28. Serevina, V., Yumna, A., & Islamiah, N. (2021). Pelatihan media PhET simulation untuk pembelajaran jarak jauh. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Sains dan Aplikasinya (JPMSA), 1(2), 14-23. https://10.21009/jpmsa.v1i2.22673.
  29. Siahaan, F. E., & Pane, E. P. (2021). Penerapan Pendekatan Saintifik Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Untuk Meningkatkan Soft Skills Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika, Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5877–5884.
  30. Sirait, S.H., Irwansyah, Sinulingga, K.N.B., and Putri, J.I. (2025). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Berbasis Model Inkuiri dengan Media PhET pada Hasil Belajar IPA dan Aktivitas Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 15(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v15i1.2359.
  31. Suarmika, P. E., Pratiwi, V., & Samsuri. 2024. Determinasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Media Interaktif PhET terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SD. JPDI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 9(54), 67–71.
  32. Sun, Y., & Chan, M. (2024). Pathways to early science literacy: Investigating the different role of language and reading skills in science literacy among early primary school children. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2335671.
  33. Trianto. 2007. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Surabaya: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  34. Verawati, N., & Wahyudi, W. (2024). Raising the Issue of Local Wisdom in Science Learning and Its Impact on Increasing Students' Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i1.10881.
  35. Verdian, F., Jadid, M. A., & Rahmani, M.N. (2021). Studi Penggunaan Media Simulasi PhET dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 01(02), 39-44.
  36. Wahyuni, T., Firdaus, M., & Silfianah, I. (2024). The Correlation Between Digital Literacy And Scientific Literacy Abilities With Students’ Learning Outcomes On Chemistry Material In Everyday Life. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains. https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v15i2.20199.
  37. Wahyuni, R.I. and Rosdiana, L. (2023). Penerapan Model Guided Inquiry Learning dengan Media PhET Simulation untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 13(2), 487-492. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v13i2.1067.
  38. Wasis, Rahayu, Y. S., Sunarti, T., and Indana, S. (2020). HOTS & Literasi Sains: Konsep, Pembelajaran dan Penilaiannya. Surabaya: Kun Fayakun.
  39. Widiyanti, F., Indriyanti, D. R., & Ngabekti, S. 2015. The Effectiveness of The Application of Scientific Literacy-Based Natural Science Teaching Set Toward The Students’ Learning Activities and Outcomes on The Topic of The Interaction of Living Organism and Environment. JPPI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i1.3496
  40. Wijaya, S., & Handayani, S. L. (2021). Pengaruh Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (Pogil) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Di Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Basicedu, 5(4), 2521–2529.