Analysis of Senior High School Students' Science Literacy in Understanding Static Fluids

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: May 24, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jape.v1i1.376
Keywords:
scientific literacy skill, static fluid material

Main Article Content

Nora Indrasari
Universitas Negeri Malang

Abstract

This article aims to identify the scientific literacy skills of high school students in static fluid material. This type of research is quantitative descriptive with a study sample of 136 high school 12th grade students. The data collection technique is a test instrument in the form of 10 multiple choice questions reasoned had 0.741 reliability. The test results showed that the scientific literacy ability test scores of students with static fluid material were 16% at the SI level, 4% at the NSL level,  40% at the FSL level, 38% at the level CSL, and 2% at the MSL level.

Article Details

How to Cite
Indrasari, N. (2025). Analysis of Senior High School Students’ Science Literacy in Understanding Static Fluids. Journal of Advances in Physics Education, 1(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.23960/jape.v1i1.376
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Advances in Physics Education
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright Retention: © Authors retain the copyright of their work without any restrictions.
 
Publishing Rights: Authors retain the right to publish and distribute their work without any restrictions.


License Agreement: By publishing with Journal of Advances in Physics Education, authors agree that their work will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that appropriate credit is given, any changes are indicated, and the new creations are licensed under the same terms.

References

Besson, U. (2004). Students’ conceptions of fluid statics: An investigation of the influence of teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 663-689.

Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann.

Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Scientific literacy and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 367-370.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching scientific inquiry: Exploring science practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 737-762.

Muller, D. A., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2019). Raising student understanding: A deep-learning approach. Physics Education, 54(3), 1-10.

NGSS. (2018). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.

OECD. (2020). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.

Pratiwi, H., et al. (2013). Misconceptions in physics learning: Static fluids case. Journal of Science Education, 14(2), 122-130.

Rustaman, N. (2017). Engineering framework in science education. Journal of Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 45-58.

Scherr, R. E., & Robertson, A. D. (2021). Applying engineering perspectives to physics education. American Journal of Physics, 89(4), 311-320.

Soobard, R., & Rannikmae, M. (2011). Assessing student scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1153-1173.

Sukowati, D., et al. (2016). The state of science literacy in 2013 curriculum schools. Educational Review, 5(2), 34-50.

Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2020). Conceptual change in science education. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 1-15.