POLITENESS VIOLATIONS IN NETIZENS’ UTTERANCES IN THE COMMENT SECTION OF FACEBOOK REELS

https://doi.org/10.23960/kata.v14i1.1059
Diterbitkan: Apr 24, 2026

Abstrak:

This study aims to (1) analyze politeness violations in netizens’ utterances in the comment section of Facebook Reels and (2) explain the types of utterances in maxims that violate politeness. The research employed a pragmatic and qualitative descriptive approach. Data were collected using the listening method with tapping, reading, and note-taking techniques, and analyzed through a pragmatic equivalent method with both basic and advanced techniques. The findings reveal two main points: (1) the existence of politeness violations in netizens’ utterances, and (2) the types of utterances associated with maxim violations. Violations were identified in five maxims: tact, generosity, modesty, approbation, and agreement. The utterances consisted of commissive, representative, perlocutionary, directive, locutionary, illocutionary, and expressive forms. Out of 120 utterances, 116 were found to violate politeness, including 19 violating the tact maxim, 8 the generosity maxim, 27 the modesty maxim, 42 the approbation maxim, and 20 the agreement maxim. The most frequently violated maxim was approbation, with 42 utterances (36.20%). The utterance types within this maxim included perlocutionary, directive, representative, and expressive forms.

Penulis:
Afif Restu Fauzi
University of Palangka Raya
View PDF (ENGLISH)
Cara Mengutip
Fauzi, A. R. (2026). POLITENESS VIOLATIONS IN NETIZENS’ UTTERANCES IN THE COMMENT SECTION OF FACEBOOK REELS. Jurnal Kata: Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya, 14(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.23960/kata.v14i1.1059
Unduh Sitasi
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.
Terbitan & Bagian
Vol 14 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Kata : Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajarannya
Articles
Referensi

    Chaer, Abdul. 2010. Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

    Cahyaningrum, Fitria, dkk. 2018. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa dalam Berdiskusi: Language Politeness of Students Discussion”. Madah, 9(1):53-54.

    Darighgoftar, Samaneh. 2012. “Different Homeopathic Characters Violate Cooperative Principles Differently”. Macrothnik Institue: International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3):278.

    Farahsani, Yashinta. 2017. “The Implementation of Politeness Principles: By Javanese People: A Cultural Pragmatic Study”. International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences, 4(1):5.

    Fallianda. (2018). Kesantunan Berbahasa Pengguna Media Sosial Instagram: Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Etnolingual, 2(1), 35-36.

    Fauzi, A., Zulaeha, I., & Pristiwati, R. (2020). Violation of Politeness Principle on Students Speech in Multicultural Society: Sosiopragmatic Study. 3–9. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2290327

    Jayanti, M., Subyantoro. (2019). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa pada Teks di Media Sosial. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 8(2), 119.

    Leech, Geoffrey. (1993). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

    Nofrita, M. dan Wahyuni, A.R. (2025). Penggunaan Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Komentar Netizen Akun Instagram Artis PL. Jurnal Pendidikan Multidisipliner, 8(1), 12.

    Maulidi, Ahmad. (2016). Kesantunan Berbahasa pada Media Jejaring Sosial Facebook. e-Jurnal Bahasantodea, 3(4), 42-43. oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6328

    Musfiroh, Tadkiroatun dan Khasanah, Nurul. (2019). Kepatuhan dan Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa Di Media Sosial Facebook. E-Journal Student: Sastra Indonesia, 8(5), 25-26.

    Omar, Abdulfattah, Mohammed Ilyas, & Mohamed Ali Mohamed Kassem. (2018). “Linguistic Politeness and Media Education: A Lingua-Pragmatic Study of Changing Trends In ‘Forms of Address’ In Egyptian Media Talk Shows”. Journal of Social Studies Education Resear, 9(2):349-365.

    Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

    Sudiana, I.N., Suandi, I.N. dan Yanti, L.P.F. (2021). Analisis Kesantunan Berbahasa Warganet pada Kolom Komentar Berita Di Media Sosial Facebook. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, 10(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.23887/jurnal_bahasa.v10i1.405

    Sulastri, L. (2019). Pelanggaran Kesantunan Berbahasa pada Komentar YouTube. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 19(2), 145–157.

    Rohmadi, M. (2017). Pragmatik: Teori dan Kajian Nusantara. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

    Wijana, I. D. P. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi.

    Zulaeha, Ida. 2013. “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berbahasa Indonesia Berkonteks Multikultural”. Litera, 12(1):104-105.

  1. Chaer, Abdul. 2010. Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  2. Cahyaningrum, Fitria, dkk. 2018. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa dalam Berdiskusi: Language Politeness of Students Discussion”. Madah, 9(1):53-54.
  3. Darighgoftar, Samaneh. 2012. “Different Homeopathic Characters Violate Cooperative Principles Differently”. Macrothnik Institue: International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3):278.
  4. Farahsani, Yashinta. 2017. “The Implementation of Politeness Principles: By Javanese People: A Cultural Pragmatic Study”. International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences, 4(1):5.
  5. Fallianda. (2018). Kesantunan Berbahasa Pengguna Media Sosial Instagram: Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Etnolingual, 2(1), 35-36.
  6. Fauzi, A., Zulaeha, I., & Pristiwati, R. (2020). Violation of Politeness Principle on Students Speech in Multicultural Society: Sosiopragmatic Study. 3–9. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2290327
  7. Jayanti, M., Subyantoro. (2019). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa pada Teks di Media Sosial. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 8(2), 119.
  8. Leech, Geoffrey. (1993). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
  9. Nofrita, M. dan Wahyuni, A.R. (2025). Penggunaan Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Komentar Netizen Akun Instagram Artis PL. Jurnal Pendidikan Multidisipliner, 8(1), 12.
  10. Maulidi, Ahmad. (2016). Kesantunan Berbahasa pada Media Jejaring Sosial Facebook. e-Jurnal Bahasantodea, 3(4), 42-43. oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6328
  11. Musfiroh, Tadkiroatun dan Khasanah, Nurul. (2019). Kepatuhan dan Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa Di Media Sosial Facebook. E-Journal Student: Sastra Indonesia, 8(5), 25-26.
  12. Omar, Abdulfattah, Mohammed Ilyas, & Mohamed Ali Mohamed Kassem. (2018). “Linguistic Politeness and Media Education: A Lingua-Pragmatic Study of Changing Trends In ‘Forms of Address’ In Egyptian Media Talk Shows”. Journal of Social Studies Education Resear, 9(2):349-365.
  13. Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
  14. Sudiana, I.N., Suandi, I.N. dan Yanti, L.P.F. (2021). Analisis Kesantunan Berbahasa Warganet pada Kolom Komentar Berita Di Media Sosial Facebook. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, 10(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.23887/jurnal_bahasa.v10i1.405
  15. Sulastri, L. (2019). Pelanggaran Kesantunan Berbahasa pada Komentar YouTube. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 19(2), 145–157.
  16. Rohmadi, M. (2017). Pragmatik: Teori dan Kajian Nusantara. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.
  17. Wijana, I. D. P. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  18. Zulaeha, Ida. 2013. “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berbahasa Indonesia Berkonteks Multikultural”. Litera, 12(1):104-105.