Publication Ethics

Jurnal Inovatif Ilmu Pendidikan aims to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of scholarly information. We publish original research articles, review papers, and case studies related to foreign language education and allied fields, provided that these works have not been published elsewhere in any language nor are under consideration for publication by another journal. The following statement outlines the ethical responsibilities expected of all parties involved in publishing within this journal, based on the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

 

Responsibilities of Authors

  • Reporting Standards: Authors must present a truthful and accurate account of their original research, along with an objective discussion of its implications. Data and results should be reported honestly, without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate manipulation. Manuscripts must provide sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the study. Fraudulent or knowingly misleading information is considered unethical and will not be tolerated. Submissions should comply with the journal’s guidelines.
  • Originality and Plagiarism: Authors are required to submit entirely original work. Manuscripts must not be simultaneously submitted to more than one journal unless permission for co-publication is granted. Prior relevant publications, whether by the authors or others, must be properly cited. Direct quotations should be clearly marked and referenced appropriately.
  • Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications: Authors should not submit identical manuscripts to multiple journals concurrently nor publish redundant versions of the same research. Any multiple publications stemming from one project must be clearly identified and the primary publication properly referenced. Concurrent submission is regarded as unethical and unacceptable.
  • Acknowledgment of Sources: All sources of data and influences on the research must be fully acknowledged. Proper credit to the work of others is mandatory.
  • Authorship: Authorship must accurately reflect individual contributions to the research and manuscript preparation. Only those who have significantly contributed to conception, design, execution, or interpretation should be listed as authors. Others who contributed less substantially should be acknowledged. All authors must review and approve the final submitted manuscript and agree to be listed as co-authors.
  • Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Authors must disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that could influence the research or its interpretation. Funding sources should also be declared.
  • Correction of Errors: Authors must promptly inform the editor if significant errors or inaccuracies are discovered after submission, cooperating to correct or retract the paper if necessary.
  • Safety Concerns: Manuscripts involving hazardous materials, procedures, or equipment must clearly identify such risks.

 

Responsibilities of Editors

  • Publication Decisions: Editors make acceptance, rejection, or revision requests based on peer review and editorial board recommendations. Decisions should prioritize scientific validity and relevance to the readership, guided by journal policy and legal considerations including copyright and plagiarism. Editors may consult reviewers and fellow editors to reach decisions and are accountable for maintaining publication integrity and quality.
  • Manuscript Review: Editors ensure initial evaluation for originality and manage the peer review process fairly and transparently. Qualified reviewers without conflicts of interest should be selected, and review procedures should be clearly communicated to authors.
  • Fairness: Manuscripts are reviewed impartially regardless of author demographics such as gender, ethnicity, or nationality. Editors must uphold editorial independence and integrity in all decisions.
  • Confidentiality: Information about submissions must be kept confidential, respecting data protection and consent requirements related to research subjects.
  • Conflict of Interest: Editors must not use unpublished data for personal research without consent and should recuse themselves from decisions where conflicts exist.

 

Responsibilities of Reviewers

  • Confidentiality: Manuscripts under review are confidential and must not be shared or discussed outside the review process without permission.
  • Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers should verify that authors have appropriately cited relevant literature and alert the editor to any omissions or ethical concerns, including suspected plagiarism or misconduct. Such concerns should be kept confidential unless further investigation is requested.
  • Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted impartially and constructively, providing clear, evidence-based feedback to help authors improve their work. Reviewers should distinguish between essential and supplementary suggestions.
  • Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must disclose and avoid reviewing manuscripts where conflicts exist, including competitive or collaborative relationships with authors. If author identities are known in double-blind review, potential conflicts should be reported.

Timeliness: Reviewers agree to provide feedback within agreed timeframes and promptly inform editors if delays occur or if they cannot complete the review.