A STUDY OF SYNTACTIC FUNCTIONS IN PERSUASIVE TEXTS WITH THE THEME OF REGIONAL LANGUAGE PRESERVATION IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN GRAMMAR

Diterbitkan: Apr 26, 2026

Abstrak:

One of the important efforts to maintain cultural identity in the midst of the development of globalization, which has an impact on reducing the use of regional languages, is the preservation of regional languages. Persuasive texts are a tool to increase public awareness about the importance of preserving regional languages. From the perspective of Indonesian Grammar, this study examines the syntactic function in a persuasive text entitled "Come on, Learn Indonesian Regional Languages!" This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach with a content analysis design. The data collected for the study consisted of entire sentences in a persuasive text that were analyzed through documentation and read-note techniques. Then the data is categorized according to syntax functions, which include subjects, predicates, objects, complements, and descriptions. The results showed that texts with various sentence patterns used all syntactic functions, including S–P–O–K, K–S–P–O, K–S–P–O, K–S–P–O, S–P–O, S–P–O, K–S–P–O, and K–S–P–K. The S–P–O and P–O patterns were most commonly used to convey invitations, while the adverb function is widely used to reinforce facts, reasoning, and the results show that persuasive messages about the preservation of regional languages can be conveyed more effectively by using proper syntactic functions.

Penulis:
1 . Novita Sari Sirait
2 . Sarma Panggabean
Cara Mengutip
Sirait, N. S., & Panggabean, S. (2026). A STUDY OF SYNTACTIC FUNCTIONS IN PERSUASIVE TEXTS WITH THE THEME OF REGIONAL LANGUAGE PRESERVATION IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN GRAMMAR. Jurnal Kata: Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya, 14(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.23960/kata.v14i1.2152

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.
Referensi

    Aldiansyah, W., Dewi, I., & Laja, A. (2025). Analisis struktur kalimat dalam konten akun Instagram @kata.cerdas (Kajian sintaksis bahas Indonesia). Peneroka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(1), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.30739/peneroka.v5i1.3842.

    Austin, P. K., & Sallabank, J. (Eds.). (2011). The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975981.

    Brenzinger, M. (Ed.). (2007). Language diversity endangered. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197129.

    Dewi, A. C. (2025). Media visual sebagai sarana peningkatan keterampilan menulis teks persuasi. Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra, 4(2), 88–97.

    Dwiyanti, B. (2024). Struktur sintaksis dalam retorika persuasif media digital. AUFKLARUNG: Journal of Language Studies, Indonesian Literature, and Its Learning, 2(1), 22–31.

    Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368.

    Gracella, E., Sirait, J., Sitanggang Gusar, M. R., Monalisa Frince S., & Siregar, J. (2022). Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran aktif MIKiR terhadap keterampilan menulis teks persuasi. JBSI: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.47709/jbsi.v2i2.1857

    Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (2006). Saving languages: An introduction to language revitalization. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616853.

    Kroon, S., & Swanenberg, J. (Eds.). (2019). Chronotopic identities: Rescaling linguistic, cultural, and social belonging in particles and praise. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/KROON7572.

    Lestari, M. P., Muna, A. F., Permatasari, A. L., Khoirunnisa, O. K., & Darmuki, A. (2025). Fungsi, kategori, dan peran sintaksis dalam teks berita digital. Jurnal Edukasi Bahasa, 12(1), 36–43.

    Luturmas, S., Berlianty, T., & Balik, A. (2022). Pelestarian bahasa daerah Tanimbar sebagai upaya perlindungan ekspresi budaya tradisional hak kekayaan intelektual (HKI). Jurnal Hukum dan Kebudayaan, 2(1), 69–78.

    Mailani, O., Nuraeni, I., Syakila, S. A., & Lazuardi, J. (2022). Bahasa sebagai sarana komunikasi dalam kehidupan manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 1(2), 1–10.

    Putri, R., Us, J., Rubiyanti, F., Sari, D., & Shaffilia, F. (2024). Analisis fungsi, kategori, dan peran sintaksis dalam teks deskripsi buku bahasa Indonesia Kelas VII Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(2), 112–121.

    Ramadhani, R., Hamzah, R. A., & Ramadani, C. A. (2025). Struktur linguistik bahasa Indonesia sebagai acuan penggunaan tata bahasa (sintaksis). Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 2(4), 27–33.

    Sugiono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.

    Virtanen, P. K. (2019). Indigenous nyelv revitalization and youth participation: Syntactic and functional adaptations. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2019(255), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-2003.

    Virtanen, T. (1992). Given and new information in persuasive texts: An analysis of syntactic functions and text strategy. Languages in Contrast, 4(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.4.2.04vir.

  1. Aldiansyah, W., Dewi, I., & Laja, A. (2025). Analisis struktur kalimat dalam konten akun Instagram @kata.cerdas (Kajian sintaksis bahas Indonesia). Peneroka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(1), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.30739/peneroka.v5i1.3842.
  2. Austin, P. K., & Sallabank, J. (Eds.). (2011). The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975981.
  3. Brenzinger, M. (Ed.). (2007). Language diversity endangered. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197129.
  4. Dewi, A. C. (2025). Media visual sebagai sarana peningkatan keterampilan menulis teks persuasi. Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra, 4(2), 88–97.
  5. Dwiyanti, B. (2024). Struktur sintaksis dalam retorika persuasif media digital. AUFKLARUNG: Journal of Language Studies, Indonesian Literature, and Its Learning, 2(1), 22–31.
  6. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368.
  7. Gracella, E., Sirait, J., Sitanggang Gusar, M. R., Monalisa Frince S., & Siregar, J. (2022). Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran aktif MIKiR terhadap keterampilan menulis teks persuasi. JBSI: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.47709/jbsi.v2i2.1857
  8. Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (2006). Saving languages: An introduction to language revitalization. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616853.
  9. Kroon, S., & Swanenberg, J. (Eds.). (2019). Chronotopic identities: Rescaling linguistic, cultural, and social belonging in particles and praise. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/KROON7572.
  10. Lestari, M. P., Muna, A. F., Permatasari, A. L., Khoirunnisa, O. K., & Darmuki, A. (2025). Fungsi, kategori, dan peran sintaksis dalam teks berita digital. Jurnal Edukasi Bahasa, 12(1), 36–43.
  11. Luturmas, S., Berlianty, T., & Balik, A. (2022). Pelestarian bahasa daerah Tanimbar sebagai upaya perlindungan ekspresi budaya tradisional hak kekayaan intelektual (HKI). Jurnal Hukum dan Kebudayaan, 2(1), 69–78.
  12. Mailani, O., Nuraeni, I., Syakila, S. A., & Lazuardi, J. (2022). Bahasa sebagai sarana komunikasi dalam kehidupan manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 1(2), 1–10.
  13. Putri, R., Us, J., Rubiyanti, F., Sari, D., & Shaffilia, F. (2024). Analisis fungsi, kategori, dan peran sintaksis dalam teks deskripsi buku bahasa Indonesia Kelas VII Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(2), 112–121.
  14. Ramadhani, R., Hamzah, R. A., & Ramadani, C. A. (2025). Struktur linguistik bahasa Indonesia sebagai acuan penggunaan tata bahasa (sintaksis). Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 2(4), 27–33.
  15. Sugiono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.
  16. Virtanen, P. K. (2019). Indigenous nyelv revitalization and youth participation: Syntactic and functional adaptations. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2019(255), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-2003.
  17. Virtanen, T. (1992). Given and new information in persuasive texts: An analysis of syntactic functions and text strategy. Languages in Contrast, 4(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.4.2.04vir.