Strategi Pembelajaran Membaca Pemahaman Bahasa Prancis Berdasarkan Konstruktivisme di Empat Universitas di Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.23960/pranala.v7i1.838
Published: Dec 27, 2024

Abstract:

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan penerapan konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran pemahaman membaca bahasa Prancis pada mahasiswa program studi pendidikan bahasa Prancis di empat universitas dengan menggunakan metode survei deskriptif kuantitatif. Sampel berjumlah 74 orang dari seluruh mahasiswa program studi pendidikan bahasa Perancis dari empat universitas yang berjumlah 740 mahasiswa. Uji validitas isi dan konstruk digunakan, serta uji reliabilitas Alpha Cronbach sebesar 0,65 dari 19 item yang menunjukkan bahwa penelitian ini valid dan reliabel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa karakteristik responden mayoritas adalah mahasiswa baru angkatan 2022 dan 2023, berjenis kelamin perempuan dan berusia 19 hingga 21 tahun dengan kemampuan dasar bahasa Prancis yang perlu dikembangkan. Sampel menunjukkan minat terhadap teks yang berkaitan dengan sejarah dan budaya, sehingga mereka harus banyak dilatih dan diajarkan strategi membaca. Pemahaman membaca difasilitasi melalui kegiatan interaktif dan kolaboratif seperti diskusi kelompok dan simulasi. Pendekatan konstruktivis kuat pada interaksi sosial dan penggunaan konteks budaya yang relevan, sedangkan kelemahannya adalah ketergantungan pembelajar pada bantuan pihak luar, sehingga menghambat proses belajar pembelajar untuk mengkonstruksi pengetahuannya secara mandiri, oleh karena itu diperlukan perbaikan dalam proses pembelajaran. , penggunaan teknologi dan penambahan tantangan pada teks. Penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman yang lebih baik tentang sejauh mana pendekatan konstruktivis diterapkan dalam pembelajaran pemahaman membaca bahasa Prancis untuk mahasiswa dari empat universitas.

Keywords:
1. Membaca Pemahaman
2. Konstruktivisme
3. Mahasiswa Indonesia
Authors:
1 . Diana Rosita
2 . Endang Ikhtiarti
Universitas Lampung
3 . Indah Nevira Trisna
Universitas Lampung
View PDF
How to Cite
Rosita, D., Ikhtiarti, E. ., & Trisna, I. N. (2024). Strategi Pembelajaran Membaca Pemahaman Bahasa Prancis Berdasarkan Konstruktivisme di Empat Universitas di Indonesia. PRANALA (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Prancis), 7(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.23960/pranala.v7i1.838
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX
Issue & Section
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): PRANALA Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Prancis
Articles
References

    Agung, A. S. S. (2019). Current Challenges in Teaching English in the Least-developed Region in Indonesia. 9, 266–271.

    Al-Jarrah, T. M., Noraien Mansor, Talafhah, R. H., & Jarrah Mohammad Al-Jarrah. (2019). The Application Of Metacognition, Cognitivism, And Constructivism In Teaching Writing Skills. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2531617

    Alkhudiry, R. (2022). The Contribution of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory in Mediating L2 Knowledge Co-Construction. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2117–2123. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.19

    Aritonang, I. R., Lasmana, S., & Kurnia, D. (2019). The Analysis Of Skimming And Scanning Technique To Improve Students In Teaching Reading Comprehension. Project (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v1i2.p101-106

    Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 5(VI). www.iosrjournals.org

    Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching By Principles an Interactive approach to language pedagogy.

    Brown, H. D. (2008). Prinsip Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Bahasa. Pearson Education Inc.

    Buzan, T. (2012). The Ultimate Book of Mind Maps. Harper Collins Publisher.

    Byram, M., & Hu, A. (2013). Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (2nd ed). Routledge.

    Chaudhary, N., & Pillai, P. (2019). Bruner and Beyond: A Commentary. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 53(4), 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09486-3

    Chen, Y. (2022). A Review of Research on Krashen’s SLA Theory Based on WOS Database (1974-2021). Creative Education, 13(07), 2147–2156. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.137135

    Conseil de l’europe. (2018). Cadre Européen Commun De Référence Pour Les Langues : Apprendre, Enseigner, Évaluer Volume Complémentaire Avec De Nouveaux Descripteurs. Strasbourg Cedex.

    Coppe, T., März, V., Decuypere, M., Springuel, F., & Colognesi, S. (2018). Ouvrir la boîte noire du travail de préparation de l’enseignant: Essai de modélisation et d’illustration autour du choix et de l’évolution d’un document support de cours. Revue française de pédagogie, 204, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.8358

    Culligan, K. (2013). The Relationship Between Language and thought: Exploring Vygotsky and Sociocultural Approaches to Second Language Research.

    Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher Learning: What Matters? Educational Leadership, 66, 46–53.

    Farkas, W. A., & Jang, B. G. (2019). Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating a School-Based Literacy Program for Adolescent Learners With Reading Difficulties: A Mixed-Methods Study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1541770

    Fenwick, G. D., & Neal, D. J. (2001). Effect of Gender Composition on Group Performance. Gender, Work & Organization, 8(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00129

    George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update (4th ed). Allyn and Bacon.

    Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading (Third Edition). Routledge.

    Grabe, W., & Yamashita, J. (2007). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice (Second).

    Harmer, J. (2010). How to teach English. Buch (New ed., 6. impr). Pearson/Longman.

    Hedge, T. (2011). Teaching and learning in the language classroom (1 publ., [Nachdr.]). Oxford Univ. Press.

    Hyder, I., & Bhamani, S. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy (Cognitive Domain) in Higher Education Settings: Reflection Brief. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 3(2), 288. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v3i2.1039

    Hyland, K. (2018). Genre and Second Language Writing. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (1st ed., pp. 1–6). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0535

    Institute of Development Studies, & Cornwall, A. (2016). Towards a Pedagogy for the Powerful. Institute of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.168

    Kozulin, A. (2004). Vygotsky’s theory in the classroom: Introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173233

    Kumar Shah, R. (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600

    Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages are Learned. Oxford University Press.

    Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., & Tumurang, H. (2018). Effectiveness of Learning Method Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) for Increasing Learning Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3).

    Maun, I. (2009). Scaffolds for reading in French: Lessons from history, guidance for the future? Language Awareness, 18(2), 198–214. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903009311

    McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). MATERIALS AND METHODS IN ELT. A TEACHER’S GUIDE. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Nainggolan, A. M., & Daeli, A. (2021). Analisis Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget dan Implikasinya bagi Pembelajaran. Journal of Psychology “Humanlight,” 2(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.51667/jph.v2i1.554

    Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design.

    Nunan, D., & Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

    Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2010). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Sarbazi, M., Khany, R., & Shoja, L. (2021). The predictive power of vocabulary, syntax and metacognitive strategies for L2 reading comprehension. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 39(3), 244–258. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2021.1939076

    Sholeh, M. B. (2020). Implementation of Task-based Learning in Teaching English in Indonesia: Benefits and Problems. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v15i1.26004

    Sinaga, Y. K., Herman, H., & Siahaan, P. L. (2020). The Effect of Partner Reading Strategy on Reading Comprehension. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.2.206-218

    Suhendi, A., & Purwarno, P. (2018). Constructivist Learning Theory: The Contribution to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. KnE Social Sciences, 3(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1921

    Tan, C., & Ng, C. S. L. (2021, December). Constructivism in Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.92

    Tomljenović, Z., & Tatalović Vorkapić, S. (2020). Constructivism in Visual Arts Classes. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(4), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.913

    UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/CGBA9153

    Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. Routledge.

    Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and Society by Lev Vygotsky.

    Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational Psychology (Ninth). Pearson.

    Woolfolk, A. (2020). Educational Psychology Active Learning Edition (Kesepuluh). Pustaka Pelajar.

    Yapp, D. J., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2021). Improving second language reading comprehension through reading strategies A meta-analysis of L2 reading strategy interventions. Journal of Second Language Studies, 4(1), 154–192. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19013.yap

    Yulia, Y. (2013). Teaching Challenges In Indonesia: Motivating Students And Teachers’ Classroom Language. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i1.186

  1. Agung, A. S. S. (2019). Current Challenges in Teaching English in the Least-developed Region in Indonesia. 9, 266–271.
  2. Al-Jarrah, T. M., Noraien Mansor, Talafhah, R. H., & Jarrah Mohammad Al-Jarrah. (2019). The Application Of Metacognition, Cognitivism, And Constructivism In Teaching Writing Skills. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2531617
  3. Alkhudiry, R. (2022). The Contribution of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory in Mediating L2 Knowledge Co-Construction. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2117–2123. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.19
  4. Aritonang, I. R., Lasmana, S., & Kurnia, D. (2019). The Analysis Of Skimming And Scanning Technique To Improve Students In Teaching Reading Comprehension. Project (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v1i2.p101-106
  5. Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 5(VI). www.iosrjournals.org
  6. Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching By Principles an Interactive approach to language pedagogy.
  7. Brown, H. D. (2008). Prinsip Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Bahasa. Pearson Education Inc.
  8. Buzan, T. (2012). The Ultimate Book of Mind Maps. Harper Collins Publisher.
  9. Byram, M., & Hu, A. (2013). Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (2nd ed). Routledge.
  10. Chaudhary, N., & Pillai, P. (2019). Bruner and Beyond: A Commentary. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 53(4), 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09486-3
  11. Chen, Y. (2022). A Review of Research on Krashen’s SLA Theory Based on WOS Database (1974-2021). Creative Education, 13(07), 2147–2156. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.137135
  12. Conseil de l’europe. (2018). Cadre Européen Commun De Référence Pour Les Langues : Apprendre, Enseigner, Évaluer Volume Complémentaire Avec De Nouveaux Descripteurs. Strasbourg Cedex.
  13. Coppe, T., März, V., Decuypere, M., Springuel, F., & Colognesi, S. (2018). Ouvrir la boîte noire du travail de préparation de l’enseignant: Essai de modélisation et d’illustration autour du choix et de l’évolution d’un document support de cours. Revue française de pédagogie, 204, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.8358
  14. Culligan, K. (2013). The Relationship Between Language and thought: Exploring Vygotsky and Sociocultural Approaches to Second Language Research.
  15. Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher Learning: What Matters? Educational Leadership, 66, 46–53.
  16. Farkas, W. A., & Jang, B. G. (2019). Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating a School-Based Literacy Program for Adolescent Learners With Reading Difficulties: A Mixed-Methods Study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1541770
  17. Fenwick, G. D., & Neal, D. J. (2001). Effect of Gender Composition on Group Performance. Gender, Work & Organization, 8(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00129
  18. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update (4th ed). Allyn and Bacon.
  19. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading (Third Edition). Routledge.
  20. Grabe, W., & Yamashita, J. (2007). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice (Second).
  21. Harmer, J. (2010). How to teach English. Buch (New ed., 6. impr). Pearson/Longman.
  22. Hedge, T. (2011). Teaching and learning in the language classroom (1 publ., [Nachdr.]). Oxford Univ. Press.
  23. Hyder, I., & Bhamani, S. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy (Cognitive Domain) in Higher Education Settings: Reflection Brief. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 3(2), 288. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v3i2.1039
  24. Hyland, K. (2018). Genre and Second Language Writing. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (1st ed., pp. 1–6). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0535
  25. Institute of Development Studies, & Cornwall, A. (2016). Towards a Pedagogy for the Powerful. Institute of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.168
  26. Kozulin, A. (2004). Vygotsky’s theory in the classroom: Introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173233
  27. Kumar Shah, R. (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600
  28. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages are Learned. Oxford University Press.
  29. Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., & Tumurang, H. (2018). Effectiveness of Learning Method Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) for Increasing Learning Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3).
  30. Maun, I. (2009). Scaffolds for reading in French: Lessons from history, guidance for the future? Language Awareness, 18(2), 198–214. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903009311
  31. McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). MATERIALS AND METHODS IN ELT. A TEACHER’S GUIDE. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  32. Nainggolan, A. M., & Daeli, A. (2021). Analisis Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget dan Implikasinya bagi Pembelajaran. Journal of Psychology “Humanlight,” 2(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.51667/jph.v2i1.554
  33. Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design.
  34. Nunan, D., & Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2010). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  36. Sarbazi, M., Khany, R., & Shoja, L. (2021). The predictive power of vocabulary, syntax and metacognitive strategies for L2 reading comprehension. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 39(3), 244–258. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2021.1939076
  37. Sholeh, M. B. (2020). Implementation of Task-based Learning in Teaching English in Indonesia: Benefits and Problems. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v15i1.26004
  38. Sinaga, Y. K., Herman, H., & Siahaan, P. L. (2020). The Effect of Partner Reading Strategy on Reading Comprehension. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.2.206-218
  39. Suhendi, A., & Purwarno, P. (2018). Constructivist Learning Theory: The Contribution to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. KnE Social Sciences, 3(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1921
  40. Tan, C., & Ng, C. S. L. (2021, December). Constructivism in Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.92
  41. Tomljenović, Z., & Tatalović Vorkapić, S. (2020). Constructivism in Visual Arts Classes. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(4), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.913
  42. UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/CGBA9153
  43. Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. Routledge.
  44. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and Society by Lev Vygotsky.
  45. Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational Psychology (Ninth). Pearson.
  46. Woolfolk, A. (2020). Educational Psychology Active Learning Edition (Kesepuluh). Pustaka Pelajar.
  47. Yapp, D. J., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2021). Improving second language reading comprehension through reading strategies A meta-analysis of L2 reading strategy interventions. Journal of Second Language Studies, 4(1), 154–192. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19013.yap
  48. Yulia, Y. (2013). Teaching Challenges In Indonesia: Motivating Students And Teachers’ Classroom Language. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i1.186

Most read articles by the same author(s)