Exploring Scientific Concepts Through the Launch of Experimental Rockets in Physics Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Traditional physics instruction frequently relies on lectures, which can disconnect abstract concepts such as Newton's laws, pressure, and reaction forces from observable phenomena, particularly in resource-constrained schools. This study investigates the use of hands-on water rockets constructed from recycled PET bottles as a cost-effective, active STEM learning intervention. Methods: We implemented a four-year (2022–2025) longitudinal, mixed-methods, design-based research approach. We analyzed 108 launches, comparing propulsion methods using compressed air/water and sodium bicarbonate/vinegar. In 2025, a three-session workshop involved 24 students aged 10–14 at a public school in Recife, Brazil. Data sources included flight performance metrics, pre- and post-intervention concept tests (0–3 rubric; Cohen's kappa = .85), and observational/video records (inter-observer agreement = .82). Results: The sodium bicarbonate/vinegar propulsion produced a significantly greater mean flight distance than compressed air/water (112.3 m vs. 68.4 m; t = 6.31, p < .001, d = 1.15), with a maximum distance of 310 m but higher variability. The presence of symmetric fins was strongly associated with stable flight trajectories (87.5% vs. 31.3%; χ² = 14.27, p < .001, V = .42). Concept test scores increased from 5.21 to 9.83 (d = 2.34), and student engagement rose from 33.3% to 91.7% (φ = .62). Discussion: The water rocketry intervention enabled students to directly observe and investigate Newton's laws, pressure–thrust relationships, aerodynamic stability, and chemical propulsion, fostering a shift toward hypothesis-driven inquiry. Nevertheless, the limited sample size, lack of randomization, and absence of a control group indicate the need for further research.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Anderson, J. D. (2017). Fundamentals of aerodynamics (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Bar, V., et al. (2025). Instructional design and teaching that fosters meaningful engagement in disciplinary practice in a Maker project on projectile-motion. Physics Education, 60(6), 065012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ae0d26
Basriyah, K., & Melisa. (2025). Enhancing physics understanding through project-based learning and discovery learning: A classroom implementation study in a resource-limited Indonesian high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, *4*(3), 1794. https://doi.org/10.56741/pbpsp.v4i03.1794
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X211058251
Broto, P. E. (2023). Design and manufacture of water rockets for practicum activities in increasing demand for physics lessons. Al-Khazini: Journal of Physics Education, 3(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-khazini.v3i1.37427
Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc14_051_08_10
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
de Weck, O. L., Young, P. W., & Adams, D. (2003). The three principles of powered flight: An active learning approach. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 8.1175.1–8.1175.13.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
Gomez Monroy, L. F., Garcia Sanchez, L. A., & Garcia Sanchez, A. (2024). En El Tule Aeroespacial: Fostering STEAM education through sustainable experimental rocketry outreach. Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC-24-E1-IP-58-x87348. https://doi.org/10.52202/078378-0134
Gupta, A., et al. (2026). An offline, computer-less infrastructure for scalable physics laboratory learning. Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657604.3662035
Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: The state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90003A
Kapon, S., & Veksler, L. (2025). Longitudinal trends of high school physics students' perceptions of experience, difficulty, and development in a long-term inquiry framework. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 010101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010101
Khodadadi Azadboni, F., & Mohajery, M. (2026). Effectiveness of active teaching in addressing students' misconceptions in static electricity using SOLO Taxonomy. Physics Education, *61*(5), 055015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ae95ce
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Marranghello, G. F., Lucchese, M. M., & da Rocha, F. S. (2022). Analysis of the propulsion phase of water rockets using smartphone sensors and video analysis. The Physics Teacher, 60(6), 456–460. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0013856
Mediana, N. L., Jr., Funa, A. A., & Dio, R. V. (2025). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning (IbL) on improving students' conceptual understanding in science and mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 13(2), 532–552. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4769
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Moloi, M., & Matabane, M. E. (2024). Enhancing physical science education: The integration of digital practical work in teaching electrodynamics for experiential learning. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 9(3), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2024.64
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
Pesthy, S. G., Clark, C., Hömöstrei, M., & Jenei, P. (2026). Teaching Newton's laws through model rocketry within Kolb's experiential learning cycle. Physics Education, 61(2), 025012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ae7d77
Ribeiro, G. A. C., & Hilger, T. R. (2025). The construction of PET bottle rockets with water propulsion were means used to develop a Meaningful Learning of Newton's Third Law in a High School class. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2950(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2950/1/012015
Xiao, F., Wang, C., & Jiang, J. (2026). Active learning in university physics for sustainable higher education: Effective components, mechanisms, and SDG-aligned competency pathways—A multidimensional review. Sustainability, 18(6), 2791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18062791