Exploring Scientific Concepts Through the Launch of Experimental Rockets in Physics Education

Main Article Content

Luiz Sampaio

Abstract

Introduction: Traditional physics instruction frequently relies on lectures, which can disconnect abstract concepts such as Newton's laws, pressure, and reaction forces from observable phenomena, particularly in resource-constrained schools. This study investigates the use of hands-on water rockets constructed from recycled PET bottles as a cost-effective, active STEM learning intervention. Methods: We implemented a four-year (2022–2025) longitudinal, mixed-methods, design-based research approach. We analyzed 108 launches, comparing propulsion methods using compressed air/water and sodium bicarbonate/vinegar. In 2025, a three-session workshop involved 24 students aged 10–14 at a public school in Recife, Brazil. Data sources included flight performance metrics, pre- and post-intervention concept tests (0–3 rubric; Cohen's kappa = .85), and observational/video records (inter-observer agreement = .82). Results: The sodium bicarbonate/vinegar propulsion produced a significantly greater mean flight distance than compressed air/water (112.3 m vs. 68.4 m; t = 6.31, p < .001, d = 1.15), with a maximum distance of 310 m but higher variability. The presence of symmetric fins was strongly associated with stable flight trajectories (87.5% vs. 31.3%; χ² = 14.27, p < .001, V = .42). Concept test scores increased from 5.21 to 9.83 (d = 2.34), and student engagement rose from 33.3% to 91.7% (φ = .62). Discussion: The water rocketry intervention enabled students to directly observe and investigate Newton's laws, pressure–thrust relationships, aerodynamic stability, and chemical propulsion, fostering a shift toward hypothesis-driven inquiry. Nevertheless, the limited sample size, lack of randomization, and absence of a control group indicate the need for further research.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sampaio, L. (2026). Exploring Scientific Concepts Through the Launch of Experimental Rockets in Physics Education. Journal of Advances in Physics Education, 2(2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.23960/jape.v2i2.1677
Section
Pedagogical Methods and Strategies

References

Anderson, J. D. (2017). Fundamentals of aerodynamics (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Bar, V., et al. (2025). Instructional design and teaching that fosters meaningful engagement in disciplinary practice in a Maker project on projectile-motion. Physics Education, 60(6), 065012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ae0d26

Basriyah, K., & Melisa. (2025). Enhancing physics understanding through project-based learning and discovery learning: A classroom implementation study in a resource-limited Indonesian high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, *4*(3), 1794. https://doi.org/10.56741/pbpsp.v4i03.1794

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X211058251

Broto, P. E. (2023). Design and manufacture of water rockets for practicum activities in increasing demand for physics lessons. Al-Khazini: Journal of Physics Education, 3(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-khazini.v3i1.37427

Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc14_051_08_10

Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

de Weck, O. L., Young, P. W., & Adams, D. (2003). The three principles of powered flight: An active learning approach. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 8.1175.1–8.1175.13.

Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206

Gomez Monroy, L. F., Garcia Sanchez, L. A., & Garcia Sanchez, A. (2024). En El Tule Aeroespacial: Fostering STEAM education through sustainable experimental rocketry outreach. Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC-24-E1-IP-58-x87348. https://doi.org/10.52202/078378-0134

Gupta, A., et al. (2026). An offline, computer-less infrastructure for scalable physics laboratory learning. Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657604.3662035

Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: The state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90003A

Kapon, S., & Veksler, L. (2025). Longitudinal trends of high school physics students' perceptions of experience, difficulty, and development in a long-term inquiry framework. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 010101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010101

Khodadadi Azadboni, F., & Mohajery, M. (2026). Effectiveness of active teaching in addressing students' misconceptions in static electricity using SOLO Taxonomy. Physics Education, *61*(5), 055015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ae95ce

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Marranghello, G. F., Lucchese, M. M., & da Rocha, F. S. (2022). Analysis of the propulsion phase of water rockets using smartphone sensors and video analysis. The Physics Teacher, 60(6), 456–460. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0013856

Mediana, N. L., Jr., Funa, A. A., & Dio, R. V. (2025). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning (IbL) on improving students' conceptual understanding in science and mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 13(2), 532–552. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4769

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347

Moloi, M., & Matabane, M. E. (2024). Enhancing physical science education: The integration of digital practical work in teaching electrodynamics for experiential learning. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 9(3), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2024.64

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.

Pesthy, S. G., Clark, C., Hömöstrei, M., & Jenei, P. (2026). Teaching Newton's laws through model rocketry within Kolb's experiential learning cycle. Physics Education, 61(2), 025012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ae7d77

Ribeiro, G. A. C., & Hilger, T. R. (2025). The construction of PET bottle rockets with water propulsion were means used to develop a Meaningful Learning of Newton's Third Law in a High School class. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2950(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2950/1/012015

Xiao, F., Wang, C., & Jiang, J. (2026). Active learning in university physics for sustainable higher education: Effective components, mechanisms, and SDG-aligned competency pathways—A multidimensional review. Sustainability, 18(6), 2791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18062791